Biomass to bioenergy value-chain and optimizing costs of transportation network

Document Type : Complete scientific research article

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Forestry, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Lignocellulosic biomass, a promising renewable resource, has gained attraction as a potential alternative for biofuel production and climate change mitigation. Agricultural practices often generate significant quantities of lignocellulosic residues (e.g., crop stalks), which are frequently abandoned or burned, leading to adverse environmental impacts. Wisely collection and conversion of these residues into bioenergy could offer a twofold benefit: reducing environmental harm and partially displacing fossil fuels. The study aimed at evaluating the potential of lignocellulosic biomass from agricultural activities in Golestān province as a sustainable source for renewable energy production; and estimating the transportation costs associated with the biomass feedstock within the context of a pilot project.
Materials and methods: To do so, we employed satellite image processing (Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8) to generate land-use maps and identify the spatial distribution of biomass supply sources from four major crops (wheat, soybean, rice, and rapeseed) and estimate the available biomass volume from each crop in energy units (kWh). Subsequently, an optimization model was developed to design a biomass-to-energy supply chain network for the study area.
Results: The overall classification accuracy and kappa coefficient for wheat and rapeseed using Sentinel images were 82% and 0.74, respectively. Soybean and rice classifications using Landsat images achieved 76% and 0.63 accuracy, respectively. Area estimation identified 84,104 farms exceeding 2 ha, encompassing a total area of 468,000 ha. This represents an 11% bias compared to statistics provided by the Iran's Ministry of Agriculture organization for the same period. The optimistic scenario suggests a potential harvest of 3.8 million kWh of energy from the identified farms. The optimization model, considering both fixed and variable transportation costs, determined that locating three biorefineries would be sufficient to process the biomass and generate electricity. Transportation costs for this scenario were: US$222 million fixed cost, US$1.599 billion variable cost, and a total cost of US$1.821 billion. The optimal scenario also minimized transportation distances, with a maximum on-site distance of 81 km and an average distance of 27 km. These distances represent a significant reduction compared to single-site (74% decrease) and two-site (34% decrease) scenarios.
Conclusions: The results highlight the potential of utilizing agricultural biomass for biofuel production in Golestān province. Developing a diversified energy portfolio that reduces dependence on fossil fuels and mitigates their environmental impacts necessitates further research in this area.The results highlight the potential of utilizing agricultural biomass for biofuel production in Golestān province. Developing a diversified energy portfolio that reduces dependence on fossil fuels and mitigates their environmental impacts necessitates further research in this area.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1.Rentizelas, A. A., Tolis, A. J., & Tatsiopoulos, I. P. (2009). Logistics issues of biomass: The storage problem and the multi-biomass supply chain. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 13 (4), 887-894.
2.Cambero, C., Sowlati, T., & Pavel, M. (2016). Economic and life cycle environmental optimization of forest-based biorefinery supply chains for bioenergy and biofuel production. J. Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 107, 218-235.
3.Gracia, C., Velázquez-Martí, B., & Estornell, J. (2014). An application of the vehicle routing problem to biomass transportation. Biosystems Engineering. 124, 40-52.
4.Magazzino, C., Mele, M., Schneider, N., & Shahbaz, M. (2021). Can biomass energy curtail environmental pollution? A quantum model approach to Germany. J. of Environmental Management. 287, 112293.
5.Sahoo, K., Upadhyay, A., Runge, T., Bergman, R., Puettmann, M., & Bilek, E. (2021). Life-cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of biochar produced from forest residues using portable systems. J. Life Cycle Assessment.
26, 189-213.
6.Sahoo, K., Mani, S., Das, L., & Bettinger, P. (2018.) GIS-based assessment of sustainable crop residues for optimal siting of biogas plants. Biomass and Bioenergy. 110, 63-74.
7.Van Holsbeeck, S., & Srivastava, S. K. (2020). Feasibility of locating biomass-to-bioenergy conversion facilities using spatial information technologies: A case study on forest biomass in Queensland, Australia. Biomass and Bioenergy.
139, 105620.
8.IRNA, 2021. XXXXX-Share of renewables in Iran energy mix rising". IRNA English.
9.Solaymani, S. (2021). A review on energy and renewable energy policies in Iran. Sustainability. 13 (13), 7328.
10.Sessions, J., Smith, D., Trippe, K. M., Fried, J. S., Bailey, J. D., Petitmermet, J. H., & Campbell, J. D. (2019). Can biochar link forest restoration with commercial agriculture? Biomass and Bioenergy. 123, 175-185.
11.Nickpour, M., Khalili, M., Pazouki, M., Khalili, M., & Pazouki, M. R. (2014). Iran’s potential to convert biomass into biofuel. In CHEMTECH conference.
12.Azadbackt, M., Safieddin Ardebili, S. M., & Rahmani, M. (2021). Potential for the production of biofuels from agricultural waste, livestock, and slaughterhouse waste in Golestan province, Iran, Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. pp. 1-11.
13.Kamkar, B., Alizadeh Dehkordi, P., Aalaee Bazkiaee, P., & Abdi, O. (2021). Determination of the compliance of soybean lands with land suitability maps (Case Study: Golestan Province). Agricultural Engineering. 44 (1), 121-139.
14.Kamkar, B., Dashti Marvili, M., & Kazemi, H. (2021). Comparison of vegetation indices in estimating the residue biomass of spring and autumn crops (Watersheds in the southwest of Golestan province). J. Water and Soil Conservation. 27 (6), 121-136.
15.Bascietto, M., Sperandio, G., & Bajocco, S. (2020). Efficient estimation of biomass from residual agroforestry, ISPRS J. Geo-Information. 9 (1), 21.
16.Ezzati, S., & Mohammadi, J. (2024). A decision support model for planning of spatial large-extent biomass to bioenergy procurement network. Bioresource Technology Reports. 27, 101886.
17.Saadat, H., Adamowski, J., Bonnell, R., Sharifi, F., Namdar, M., & Ale-Ebrahim, S. (2011). Land use and land cover classification over a large area in Iran based on single-date analysis of satellite imagery. ISPRS J. Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 66 (5), 608-619.
18.Irons, J. R., Dwyer, J. L., & Barsi, J. A. (2012). The next Landsat satellite: The Landsat data continuity mission. Remote Sensing of Environment. 122, 11-21.
19.Yaghouti, H., Pazira, E., Amiri, E., & Masihabadi, M. H. (2018). Application of satellite imagery and remote sensing technology to estimate rice yield. J. of Water and Soil Resources Conservation. 7 (3), 55-69.
20.Ayamga, E. A., Kemausuor, F., & Addo, A. (2015). Technical analysis of crop residue biomass energy in an agricultural region of Ghana. Resources Conservation Research. 96, 51-60.
21.Nordin, N. A. M., Zaharudin, Z. A., Maasar, M. A., & Nordin, N. A. (2012). Finding the shortest path of the ambulance routing: Interface of Algorithm using C# programming, In 2012 IEEE symposium on humanities, science and engineering research. 1569-1573. IEEE.
22.ERIA. (2019). ‘Cost analysis of biomass power generation’. In P., Han, Kimura, S. Wongsapai, W., & Achawangku, Y. (eds.). Study on Biomass Supply Chain for Power Generation in Southern Part of Thailand. ERIA Research Project, Report FY2018 no.9, Jakarta: ERIA, pp. 50-56.