Comparison of crown competition and spatial pattern of Crataegus Azarolus L. in two situations of formation of type and accompanying species: Khoshkeroud and Perk forests of KhorramAbad

Document Type : Complete scientific research article

Authors

1 Faculty of Natural Resources, Lorestan University. KhorramAbad, Iran

2 Forestry Dept, Faculty of Natural Resources, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

3 Forestry Dept, Faculty of Natural Resources, Lorestan University, Khorram Abad, Iran

Abstract

Abstract
Background and objectives: Competition between trees is a key factor affecting the development, structure, and dynamics of forests. Therefore, many ecologists have sought to quantify competition and related factors in the forest. The forests of Lorestan province with area 1,112,475 ha are part of the important ecosystems of the Middle Zagros, the main type of which is the Iranian oak. One of the important wood species of these forests is Hawthorn, which is often present as an accompanying species and in some areas as a pure forest. This research was conducted with the aim of comparing the crown competition and the spatial distribution pattern of Hawthorn in two forest type formation and companion species.
Materials and methods: In this study, two forest habitats Khoshkeroud (with a dominant type of hawthorn) and Perk (with a dominant type of oak) were studied in Khorramabad. After the Search in the forest and determining the areas where the density of Hawthorn species existed and the necessary conditions for calculating crown competition, areas with an area of about 45 ha were determined. In each of these forests with a relatively uniform distribution, the number of 45 Hawthorn stems that had crown overlap with at least one neighbor were identified as central trees. To identify competing trees, the crown overlap method was used, and to quantify the level of competition, the ratio of the crown size of the central tree to the neighbors was used, and to calculate the spatial patterns, the uniform angle index was used. Then information including the distance and azimuth of the neighbors, the height of the central trees, and the size of the diameters of the crowns of the reference trees and competitors were measured. Due to the non-normal distribution of the data based on the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the means.
Results: Due to the different conditions of the two habitats of Khoshkeroud and Perk, there is an obvious difference in the types and diversity of species in these habitats. In addition, the average distance to effective neighbors in the competition shows a big difference, if other characteristics do not have a big difference. The number of influential neighbors in the BDC index for the Khoshkeroud habitat reaches four neighbors, while in the Perk habitat; there are at most three neighbors with overlapping crowns for the central trees. Meanwhile, more than 80% of the neighbors in the Perk habitat are species other than Hawthorn, while in the Khoshkeroud habitat, other species have allocated a small percentage. In addition to the different admixture, the results of the uniform angle index also indicate the different spatial distribution pattern of Hawthorn species in the two investigated habitats. Despite the difference in admixture and spatial distribution, there is no significant difference between the results of the competition index on the reference trees.
Conclusion: Considering that the Hawthorn genus has been suggested for afforestation of degraded areas in Zagros due to its features such as edible fruit and its ability to be used as a precursor and nurse species, the results of this research can be useful in the field of afforestation and forest cultivation.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1.Pretzsch, H. (2009). Forest dynamics, growth and yield: From measurement to model. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 664p.
2.Simard, S. W., & Sachs, D. L. (2004). Assessment of interspecific competition using relative height and distance indices in an age sequence of seral interior cedar hemlock forests in British Columbia. Canadian J. of Forest Research. 34 (6), 1228-1240.
3.Lewis, S. L., & Tanner, E. V. (2000). Effects of above‐and belowground competition on growth and survival of rain forest tree seedlings. Ecology. 81 (9), 2525-2538.
4.Mongus, D., Vilhar, U., Skudnik, M., Žalik, B., & Jesenko, D. (2018). Predictive analytics of tree growth based on complex networks of tree competition. Forest Ecology and Management. 425, 164-176.
5.Kunstler, G., Falster, D., Coomes, D. A., Hui, F., Kooyman, R. M., Laughlin, D. C., & Westoby, M. (2016). Plant functional traits have globally consistent effects on competition. Nature. 529 (7585), 204-207.
6.Burton, P. J. (1993). Some limitations inherent to static indices of plant competition. Canadian J. of Forest Research. 23 (10), 2141-2152.
7.Gray, L., & He, F. (2009). Spatial point-pattern analysis for detecting density-dependent competition in a boreal chronosequence of Alberta. Forest Ecology and Management. 259 (1), 98-106.
8.Omidvar Hosseini, F., Akhavan, R., Kia-Daliri, H., & Mataji, A. (2015). Spatial patterns and intraspecific competition of Chestnut-leaved oak (Quercus castaneifolia CA Mey.) using O-ring statistic (Case study: Neka Forest, Iran). Iranian J. of Forest and Poplar Research. 23 (2), 294-306. [In Persian]
9.Erfanifard, Y. (2016). Analysing the effect of intraspecific competition on biometric attributes of Persian oak coppice trees using pair-and mark-correlation functions in Zagros forests. J. of Wood and Forest Science and Technology. 23 (2), 89-109. [In Persian]
10.Hesabi, A., Alavi, S. J., & Esmailzadeh, O. (2022). Determination of spatial pattern and Interspecific competition in mixed yew stand in‎ Afratakhteh Forest of Aliabad. Forest Research and Development. 7 (4), 545-559. [In Persian]
11.Das, A., Battles, J., Stephenson, N. L., & van Mantgem, P. J. (2011). The contribution of competition to tree mortality in old-growth coniferous forests. Forest Ecology and Management. 261 (7), 1203-1213.
12.Forrester, D. I., Benneter, A., Bouriaud, O., & Bauhus, J. (2017). Diversity and competition influence tree allometric relationships–Developing functions for mixed‐species forests. J. of Ecology. 105 (3), 761-774.
13.Picard, N. (2019). Asymmetric competition can shape the size distribution of trees in a natural tropical forest. Forest Science. 65 (5), 562-569.
14.Pretzsch, H. (2022). Facilitation and competition reduction in tree species mixtures in Central Europe: Consequences for growth modeling and forest management. Ecological Modelling. 464, 109812.
15.Condés, S., Pretzsch, H., & del Río, M. (2023). Species admixture can increase potential tree growth and reduce competition. Forest Ecology and Management. 539, 120997.
16.Tahmasebi, M., Bordbar, S. K., Porhashemi, M., & Najafifar, A. (2024). The impact of aspect on forest structural characteristics in Zagros Forests (Case study: Tangdalab forests of Ilam province). Ecology of Iranian Forests. 11 (22), 32-43.
17.Biging, G. S., & Dobbertin, M. (1995). Evaluation of competition indices in individual tree growth models. Forest Science. 41 (2), 360-377.
18.Pommerening, A. (2002). Approaches to quantifying forest structures. Forestry, 75 (3), 305-324.
19.Potvin, C., & Dutilleul, P. (2009). Neighborhood effects and size‐asymmetric competition in a tree plantation varying in diversity. Ecology. 90 (2), 321-327.
20.Hossein Zadeh, R., Soosani, J., Naghavi, H., Nourizadeh, M., & Darabi, M. (2023). The Effect of inventory method, and the size and shape of plots on quantifying structure of Quercus brantii Lindl coppice forests. Forest and Wood Products. 75 (4), 331-340. [In Persian]
21.Askari, Y., Soltani, A., & Sohrabi, H. (2014). Evaluation of spatial distribution pattern of tree and shrub species in a central Zagros (Case study: Chahartagh forest reserve). Iranian J. of Forest and Poplar Research. 22 (2): 175-187. [In Persian]
22.Ghanbari, S., Abbasnezhad Alchin, A., Moradi, Gh. H., & Khaleghi, B. (2018). Spatial distribution pattern and economic value map of secondary products in Arasbaran protected area. J. of Wood & Forest Science and Technology. 25 (2): 19-33. [In Persian]
23.Greig-Smith, P. (1979). Pattern in vegetation. J. of Ecology. 67 (3), 755-779.
24.Levin, S. A. (1992). The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology. 73 (6), 1943-1967.
25.Hosseini, A., Jafari, M., Najafifar, A., & Rezaei, J. (2017). Evaluating and recognising the status of standard regeneration of Crataegus pontica, Cerasus microcarpa and Amigdalus orientalis in the Central Zagros forests (Case study: Dalab forests of Ilam province). Ecology of Iranian Forest. 5 (10), 42-52. [In Persian]
26.Jazirehi, M. H., & Ebrahimi Rostaghi, M. (2003). Silviculture in Zagros. TehranUniv. Press, Tehran, 560p. [In Persian]