1.Pretzsch, H. (2009). Forest dynamics, growth and yield: From measurement to model. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 664p.
2.Simard, S. W., & Sachs, D. L. (2004). Assessment of interspecific competition using relative height and distance indices in an age sequence of seral interior cedar hemlock forests in British Columbia. Canadian J. of Forest Research. 34 (6), 1228-1240.
3.Lewis, S. L., & Tanner, E. V. (2000). Effects of above‐and belowground competition on growth and survival of rain forest tree seedlings. Ecology. 81 (9), 2525-2538.
4.Mongus, D., Vilhar, U., Skudnik, M., Žalik, B., & Jesenko, D. (2018). Predictive analytics of tree growth based on complex networks of tree competition. Forest Ecology and Management. 425, 164-176.
5.Kunstler, G., Falster, D., Coomes, D. A., Hui, F., Kooyman, R. M., Laughlin, D. C., & Westoby, M. (2016). Plant functional traits have globally consistent effects on competition. Nature. 529 (7585), 204-207.
6.Burton, P. J. (1993). Some limitations inherent to static indices of plant competition. Canadian J. of Forest Research. 23 (10), 2141-2152.
7.Gray, L., & He, F. (2009). Spatial point-pattern analysis for detecting density-dependent competition in a boreal chronosequence of Alberta. Forest Ecology and Management. 259 (1), 98-106.
8.Omidvar Hosseini, F., Akhavan, R., Kia-Daliri, H., & Mataji, A. (2015). Spatial patterns and intraspecific competition of Chestnut-leaved oak (Quercus castaneifolia CA Mey.) using O-ring statistic (Case study: Neka Forest, Iran). Iranian J. of Forest and Poplar Research. 23 (2), 294-306. [In Persian]
9.Erfanifard, Y. (2016). Analysing the effect of intraspecific competition on biometric attributes of Persian oak coppice trees using pair-and mark-correlation functions in Zagros forests. J. of Wood and Forest Science and Technology. 23 (2), 89-109. [In Persian]
10.Hesabi, A., Alavi, S. J., & Esmailzadeh, O. (2022). Determination of spatial pattern and Interspecific competition in mixed yew stand in Afratakhteh Forest of Aliabad. Forest Research and Development. 7 (4), 545-559. [In Persian]
11.Das, A., Battles, J., Stephenson, N. L., & van Mantgem, P. J. (2011). The contribution of competition to tree mortality in old-growth coniferous forests. Forest Ecology and Management. 261 (7), 1203-1213.
12.Forrester, D. I., Benneter, A., Bouriaud, O., & Bauhus, J. (2017). Diversity and competition influence tree allometric relationships–Developing functions for mixed‐species forests. J. of Ecology. 105 (3), 761-774.
13.Picard, N. (2019). Asymmetric competition can shape the size distribution of trees in a natural tropical forest. Forest Science. 65 (5), 562-569.
14.Pretzsch, H. (2022). Facilitation and competition reduction in tree species mixtures in Central Europe: Consequences for growth modeling and forest management. Ecological Modelling. 464, 109812.
15.Condés, S., Pretzsch, H., & del Río, M. (2023). Species admixture can increase potential tree growth and reduce competition. Forest Ecology and Management. 539, 120997.
16.Tahmasebi, M., Bordbar, S. K., Porhashemi, M., & Najafifar, A. (2024). The impact of aspect on forest structural characteristics in Zagros Forests (Case study: Tangdalab forests of Ilam province). Ecology of Iranian Forests. 11 (22), 32-43.
17.Biging, G. S., & Dobbertin, M. (1995). Evaluation of competition indices in individual tree growth models. Forest Science. 41 (2), 360-377.
18.Pommerening, A. (2002). Approaches to quantifying forest structures. Forestry, 75 (3), 305-324.
19.Potvin, C., & Dutilleul, P. (2009). Neighborhood effects and size‐asymmetric competition in a tree plantation varying in diversity. Ecology. 90 (2), 321-327.
20.Hossein Zadeh, R., Soosani, J., Naghavi, H., Nourizadeh, M., & Darabi, M. (2023). The Effect of inventory method, and the size and shape of plots on quantifying structure of Quercus brantii Lindl coppice forests. Forest and Wood Products. 75 (4), 331-340. [In Persian]
21.Askari, Y., Soltani, A., & Sohrabi, H. (2014). Evaluation of spatial distribution pattern of tree and shrub species in a central Zagros (Case study: Chahartagh forest reserve). Iranian J. of Forest and Poplar Research. 22 (2): 175-187. [In Persian]
22.Ghanbari, S., Abbasnezhad Alchin, A., Moradi, Gh. H., & Khaleghi, B. (2018). Spatial distribution pattern and economic value map of secondary products in Arasbaran protected area. J. of Wood & Forest Science and Technology. 25 (2): 19-33. [In Persian]
23.Greig-Smith, P. (1979). Pattern in vegetation. J. of Ecology. 67 (3), 755-779.
24.Levin, S. A. (1992). The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology. 73 (6), 1943-1967.
25.Hosseini, A., Jafari, M., Najafifar, A., & Rezaei, J. (2017). Evaluating and recognising the status of standard regeneration of Crataegus pontica, Cerasus microcarpa and Amigdalus orientalis in the Central Zagros forests (Case study: Dalab forests of Ilam province). Ecology of Iranian Forest. 5 (10), 42-52. [In Persian]
26.Jazirehi, M. H., & Ebrahimi Rostaghi, M. (2003). Silviculture in Zagros. TehranUniv. Press, Tehran, 560p. [In Persian]