Zoning and prioritization of recreational activities in ‎Khamir and Qeshm mangrove forests

Document Type : Complete scientific research article

Authors

1 Postdoctoral student, Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.

2 Professor of Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

Background and purpose: In the process of planning and developing nature tourism activities, ‎proper zoning and prioritization of recreational activities for establishment and location in ‎nature is of special importance. In this way, recreational activities that are suitable and can be ‎established in the selected areas are designed and then a sustainable management program is ‎provided, taking into account training, participation and monitoring of recreational activities. ‎In the present study, while identifying suitable areas for the development of ‎recreational activities that are in demand and can be developed in the mangrove forests of ‎Khamir and Qeshm, prioritizing each of these activities according to the potential and ‎capabilities of the natural areas of the region, as well as the proposed and effective criteria for ‎their development.‎

Materials and methods: In this study, activities were zoning based on the linear relationship of ‎spatial indicators. Then the weighting and prioritization of these activities was carried out ‎according to a series of selected criteria based on the opinions of experts and specialists as well ‎as similar studies and documents. In the process of identifying the criteria, the environmental ‎conditions of the study area and other factors that can be effective on the development of ‎recreational activities in this area were taken into consideration. The studied criteria include road ‎access network, distance from the city, location of settlements, sea infrastructure and existing ‎patches, distance from protection spots and resident population. These criteria were first ‎standardized in the numerical range of 0 to 1 in a linear way, and then weight was assigned to ‎each of the criteria using the ANP model. Next, for each of the criteria, a location map was ‎prepared in Arc GIS software, and Topsis method was used in Topsis Solver software to ‎prioritize recreational activities.‎

Results: Obtained results, the zoning of recreational activities in this area ‎includes 4 options of how to combine the recreational activities required in the mangrove ‎forests of Khmer and Qeshm, which option 1 includes zones with three recreational activities ‎‎(Walking in the Forest -Watching Marine ‎Wildlife -Visiting the Forest ‎‎with a Balloon), option 2 ‎includes areas with four recreational activities (Visiting ‎Villages near the Forest -Walking in the ‎Forest -Watching Marine ‎Wildlife -Visiting the Forest ‎‎with ‎a Balloon), option 3 includes areas ‎with five recreational activities (Photography ‎in ‎Mangrove ‎‎Forest‎ -Traditional ‎Fishing -Jet ‎Boating-Watching Marine ‎Wildlife -Visiting the ‎Forest ‎‎with a Balloon) and finally option 4 ‎including seven recreational activities (Sunbathing ‎on the Beach Atv's on the Beach -Camping in ‎‎‎Mangrove ‎‎Forest -Watching Muddy ‎Islands and ‎Forest -Walking in the Forest -Watching Marine ‎‎Wildlife -Visiting the Forest ‎‎with a Balloon). The results of the evaluation of the criteria also ‎revealed that the highest weight was assigned to the criterion of sea infrastructure and existing ‎ports, Finally, the ‎ranking of recreational activities indicates that the highest priority is related to option 2, and the ‎next priorities include options 3, 1, and 4, respectively. ‎

Conclusion: In general, according to the obtained results, one of the most important factors in ‎the development of sustainable nature tourism, as well as the possibility of utilizing the potential ‎and tourist attractions in natural ecosystems, is the zoning and prioritization of recreational ‎activities according to the environmental conditions of the area. Considering that the mangrove ‎forests of Khamir and Qeshm are among the valuable protected reserves of the southern coasts ‎of the country, prioritizing recreational activities in suitable areas and outside the protection ‎zones of the region can protect these natural habitats and sustainably use the capacity of natural ‎resources and the appropriate distribution of recreational activities in the area.‎

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

1.Mahmoudi, B. A., & Mohammadi, K. (2013). Planning and placement of tourism activities in natural areas (case study: Abider resort in Sanandaj city). Natural Ecosystems of Iran. 4 (1), 75-86. [In Persian]
2.Lopes, E., Araújo-Vila, N., Costa Perinotto, A. R., & Cardoso, L. (2022). Tourism and land planning in natural spaces: bibliometric approach to the structure of scientific concepts. Land. 11 (11), 1930.
3.Komossa, F., van der Zanden, E. H., Schulp, C. J. E., & Verburg, P. H. (2018). Mapping landscape potential for outdoor recreation using different archetypical recreation user groups in the European Union. Ecological Indicators. 85, 105-116.
4.Yun, H. G., Kang, D. J., & Kang, Y. (2021). Outdoor recreation planning and management considering FROS and Carrying capacities: A case study of forest wetland in Yeongam-gum, South Korea. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 24, 502-526.
5.Word Bank. (2020). Developing nature-based tourism as a strategic sector for green growth in Lao PDR. IBRD. IDA.
6.Yuxi, Z., & Linsheng, Z. (2020). Identifying conflict tendency between nature-based tourism development and ecological protection in China. Ecological Indicators. 109, 105791.
7.Sorensen, F., & Grindsted, T. S. (2022). Sustainability approaches and nature tourism development. Annals of Tourism Research. 91, 103307.
8.Nakoui Naini, S. A., Ghanbari, Y., & Barghi, H. (2015). Assessing the sustainability of existing exploitation systems in the agricultural sector of Isfahan province (small farmers, rural production cooperatives and agricultural joint-stock companies). Quarterly J. of Geography and Environmental Sustainability. 20, 39-53. [In Persian]
9.Eagles, P. F. J., McCool, S. F., & Haynes, C. D. A. (2002). Sustainable tourism in protected areas: Guidelines for planning and management. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN.
10.Blanco-Cerradelo, L., Diéguez-Castrillón, M. I., Fraiz-Brea, J. A., & Gueimonde-Canto, A. (2022). Protected areas and tourism resources: Toward sustainable management. Land. 11 (11), 2059.
11.Ramyar, M., Asadi Amiri, T., Momeni, O., Ghasemi, M. J., & Zaheer, Z. U. R. (2020). Tourists' perspective on ecotourism infrastructures in Mazandaran province of Iran. J. of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies (JHSSS). Pp: 109-118.
12.Danehkar, A., & Mahmoudi, B. A. (2016). Design and management of forest parks. Institute of Scientific-Applied Higher Education. 293p. [In Persian]
13.Mahmoudi, B. A., Payesh, K., & Heydari, Z. (2018). Planning the development of natural tourism in the model tourism area of Anshan in Khuzestan province. Scientific and specialized quarterly of tourism research and sustainable development. 1 (3), 37-44. [In Persian]
14.Bagharian, L., Sahrainejad, N., & Mousavi Fatemi, H. (2022). Designing Biston forest park in order to develop concentrated recreation using the ecological model of tourism. Sustainability, Development and Environment. 3, 13-28. [In Persian]
15.Franceschinis, C., Swait, J., Vij, A., & Thiene, M. (2022). Determinants of recreational activities choice in protected areas. Sustainability. 14 (1), 412.
16.DaRugna, O. A., Kaemingk, M. K., Chizinski, Ch. K., & Pope, K. L. (2022). Heterogeneity of recreationists in a
park and protected area. PLoS One. 17 (5), e0268303.
17.Bayat, M., Bettinger, P., Masteali, S. H., Hamidi, S. K., Masood Awan, H. U., & Abolhasani, A. (2023). Recreation potential assessment at Tamarix forest reserves: A method based on multicriteria evaluation approach and landscape metrics. Forests. 14 (4), 705.
18.Cetin, M., & Sevik, H. (2016). Evaluating the recreation potential of Ilgaz mountain national park in Turkey. Environmental monitoring and assessment. 188, 1-10.
19.Tabibian, S., Hosseini, K., Rezvani, M., & Homayoon Nezhad, I. (2022). Ecological potential evaluation of the Kan watershed for ecotourism development using AHP and Fuzzy logic in GIS. Environmental Resources Research. 10 (1), 9-22.
20.Bazmara Baleshti, M., Tavakoli, M., & Jafarzadeh, K. (2017). Evaluation of suitable areas for ecotourism development in protected areas, a case study: Khaiz Protected Area. Spatial Planning and Planning. 21 (3), 118-95.
21.Dehghani Firouzabadi, L., Ildermi, A.R., Mirsengari, M., & Abedian, S. (2022). Assessment and zoning of potential areas for the development of water recreation by combining AHP, TOPSIS and GIS in the water resources of Durud city. Scientific J. of Geography and Planning. 26 (80), 133-155.
22.Sobhani, P., & Danehkar, A. (2023). Natural features and management areas of Khamir and Gheshm mangrove forests. Nature of Iranz. 8 (4-41), 8-16. [In Persian]
23.Danekar, A., Azizi Jalilian, M., Lotfikhah, S., Farozd, M., Davar, L., Samadi, B., Yaqoubzadeh, M., Mafigholami, D., Faizi, S., Mashhadi, M., Khatibi, A., Petrosian, H., Dadashzadeh Z., & Khodam Astanehossein. A. R. (2019). Action plan for the integrated management of the coastal zone of Bandar Khmeir city. Review plan of integrated management studies of coastal areas of Hormozgan province, Ports and Maritime Organization. Iran Structural Consulting Engineers. 382p.
24.Kabuli, M., Aliabadian, M., Tohidifar, M., Hashemi, A. R., & Roselar, K. (2016). Iran bird atlas, first edition. 624p. [In Persian]
25.Sharifi, N. (2022). Development of a comprehensive model for the purpose of zoning protected areas based on multi-criteria decision-making methods (case study: mangrove protected area). Doctoral dissertation in the field of environmental sciences. Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment - Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Unit. 150p. [In Persian]
26.Mirzaei, A. (2021). Proportion measurement of territorial waters of Hormozgan province for marine tourism activities zoning. Master's thesis in the field of natural resources-environmental engineering. Agriculture and Natural Resources Campus, Tehran Univ. of Natural Resources. [In Persian]
27.Sobhani, P., & Danehkar, A. (2023). Identifying recreational activities and investigating location indicators for nature tourism development in Hara Protected Area. Tourism management studies. 18 (61), 65-110. [In Persian]
28.Lotfikhah, S., Frouzad, M., Yaqubzadeh, M., Danehkar, A., & Kordi, F. (2018). Coastal management plan (SMP) of Hormozgan province. Review plan for integrated management studies of coastal areas of Hormozgan province. Iran's structural consulting engineers. General Directorate of Coastal and Port Engineering, Vice-Chancellor of Infrastructure Development and Engineering. Ports and Maritime Organization. 177p. [In Persian]
29.Masoudi, M., Salman Mahini, A. A., Mohammadzadeh, M., & Mirkarimi, S. H. (2016). Ecotourism planning in protected areas using multi-criteria evaluation (case study: Miankala Wildlife Sanctuary). J. of Natural Environment. 69 (1), 211-229. [In Persian]
30.Parhizgar, A., & Ghafari Gilande, A. (2006). Geographic information system and multi-criteria decision-making analysis. Samt Publications. [In Persian]
31.Asgharpour, M. J. (2006). Multi-criteria decision-making. Tehran University Press. [In Persian]
32.Chakraborty, S. (2022). TOPSIS and modified TOPSIS: A comparative analysis. Decision Analytics J. 2, 100021.‏
33.Danehkar, A., Karimi, S., Taheri Sartashnizi F., Davar, L., Jafari, Sh., Baghkhanipour, S., & Babazadeh, S. (2016). Ecological land capability evaluation in the Baliran pilot. Building a multiple-use forest management framework to conserve biodiversity in the Caspian Hyrcanian Forest Landscape. FRWO/UNDP/ GEF, 144p.
34.Babazadeh Khamene, S., Danehkar, A., & Taheri Sarteshnizi, F. (2014). Evaluation of tourism activities based on sustainable development (case study: Sisangan forest park). 21st National Geomatics Conference. Country Mapping Organization, Tehran, Pp: 1-10. [In Persian]
35.Gharibzadeh, M., Safania, A. M., Naghshbandi, S. S., & Abolfazl Farahani, A. (2023). Providing a model for the development of sports tours in the tourism industry. PLoS One, 18 (5), e0285457.
36.Tavakkoli, M. H., & Dehghani, E. (2020). Sport Tourism Site Selection Model by Environmental Capability Evaluation: Lahijan County. www.researchgate.net/publication/341434945.‎
37.Yaqubzadeh, M., Salman Mahini, A. A., Moslehi, M., Danekar, A., & Mikayili Tabrizi, A. R. (2020). Investigating the role of dock on vegetative and reproductive characteristics of mangrove trees (Avicennia marina (Forssk.) Vierh). Iranian J. of Forest and Spruce Research. 28 (3), 256-244. [In Persian]
38.Sorkhai, F., Saibani, H. R., & Swadi, M. (2021). Developing a tourism destination management model with an emphasis on beach sports (case study: coastal cities of Hormozgan). J. of urban tourism. 9 (1), 18-30. [In Persian]
39.Yang, J. J., Lo, H. W., Chao, Ch. Sh., Shen, Ch. Ch., & Yang, Ch. Ch. (2020). Establishing a sustainable sports tourism evaluation framework with a hybrid Multi-criteria decision-making model to explore potential sports tourism attractions in Taiwan. Sustainability. 12 (4), 1673.
Journal of Wood and Forest Science and Technology
Volume 30, Issue 3
October 2023
Pages 87-114

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics