Effects of using water harvesting and organic mulch on afforestation success of Periploca aphylla Decne in the desert region of southern Iran

Document Type : Complete scientific research article

Authors

1 Research Assistant Professor, Natural Resources Research Department, Hormozgan Province Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Bandar Abbas, Iran.

2 Research Instructor, Natural Resources Research Department, Hormozgan Province Agriculture and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Bandar Abbas, Iran.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: In the south of the country, due to the harsh habitat conditions and the lack of natural forests compared to other regions of the country, the issue of forest plantation is of particular importance. Considering the severe decrease in soil moisture due to the decrease of rain in recent years, the outflow of runoff during the growing season and the inappropriate distribution of rainfall in the southern and dry regions of Iran, the use of catchment systems can be an important factor in the establishment and vegetative growth of seedlings in the dry areas of southern Iran. The purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of different drainage systems along with natural mulch on the vegetative characteristics of P. aphylla seedlings.
Materials and Methods: For this purpose, P. aphylla seedling in two levels of mulch (with organic mulch and no mulch) and water harvesting system in four levels (crescent, pitting, negarim system and control), in block randomized design as split plots were designed in the field (120 seedlings = (5 repetitions) number of seedlings × (2) mulch area × (4) number of systems × (3) repetition or number of blocks). Humidity was measured 24 hours after each rainfall over three years. Vegetative characteristics (viability, canopy length, canopy area, collar diameter growth and height growth) and vigority of all seedlings were also measured and analyzed using GLM test.
Results: The results showed that the percentage of survival and canopy area of P. aphylla species was the highest with 100% and 1282.74 square centimeters respectively in pitting and crescent systems. The highest percentage of soil moisture with 22.14% was obtained in the negarim system. In general, regardless of the type of system, the percentage of soil moisture in the mulch treatment (21.66%) was higher than the no-mulch treatment (16.14%). The results of interaction effects showed that the canopy area and the growth height in the mulching system have the highest values of 1920.68 cm2 and 48.92 cm in the pitting system.
Conclusion: The results of the present research indicate the optimal performance of different methods of storing precipitation in collecting, storing and maintaining moisture in the Dehgin region, which gradually provides moisture to the plant gradually. After 3 years, results showed that the growth of P. aphylla seedling was better in water catchments especially in pitting system. Also seedling growth was better in water catchments that used organic mulch . Organic mulch is an effective factor which protects soil moisture in the root area. According to different performances of investigated factors, suggest that pitting system with organic mulch and native species should be used in Dehgin and habitats like that in the South of Iran.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

1.Guidelines for range improvements through rainwater conservation. (2009). Islamic Republic of Iran vice presidency for strategic planning and supervision, No. 419. Tehran, Iran, 63p.
2.Abdollahi, V., Zolfaghar, F., Jabbari, M., & Dehghan, M. R. (2016). Effect of a crescent pond on soil and vegetation properties in Saravan Rangelands (Sistan and Baluchestan province). Iranian J. of Range and Desert Research. 22: 4. 658-672. [In Persian]
3.Cannell, R. (2003). Carbon sequestration and biomass energy offset: theoretical, potential and achievable capacities globally, in Europe and UK. Biomass and Bioenergy. 24 (2), 97-116.
4.Chen, F. S., Zeng, D. H., Fahey, T. J., & Liao, P. F. (2010). Organic carbon in soil physical fractions under different-aged plantations of Mongolian pine in the semi-arid region of Northeast China. Applied Soil Ecology. 44 (1), 42-48.
5.Munzbergova, Z., & Ward, D. (2002). Acacia trees as keystone species in Negev desert ecosystems. J. of Vegetation Sciences. 13, 227-236.
6.Ghahreman, A. (1996). Color Flora of Iran. Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Tehran, Iran, 125p. [In Persian]
7.Soltanipour, M. A., & Asadpour, R. (2018). Investigation on the possibility of seedling production of Leptodenia pyrotechnica (Forssk.) Dence., Periploca aphylla Decne. And Vitex agnus-castus L. J. of Wood and Forest Science and Technology. 25 (2), 109-122.
8.Evenari, M., Shanan, L., & Tadmor, N. H. (1971). The Negev: The challenge of a desert. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press. 345p.
9.Tadros, M., Al-Mafleh, N., Othman, Y., & Al-Assaf, A. (2021). Water harvesting techniques for improving soil water content, and morpho-physiology of pistachio trees under rainfed conditions. Agricultural Water Management. 243, 1-9.
10.Baniasadi, M., Alikhani, N., & Naghavi, H. (2020). Investigation of impact of semi-isolated and natural surface in moisture variation of optimized micro catchment systems. J. of Irrigation and Water Engineering. 10 (38), 89-103.
[In Persian]
11.Heshmati, M., Gheitury, M., Parvizi, Y., Ahmadi, M., Shikhvaisi, M., Soleimani, H., Piruzinejad, N., Arabkhedri, M., Hossini, M., Shademani, A., & Mohammadishokoh, A. (2018). Assessment of the Effects of Micro-Catchment Runoff Harvesting System and Forest Preservation on Moisture Storage and Understory Ground Cover in the Zagros Forest, Kermanshah. Iran-Watershed Management Science & Engineering. 12 (40), 1-9. [In Persian]
12.Kamali, K., Rashidi, D., Pourghasem, A., & Karimi, B. (2020). Investigating the role of rainwater catchment systems in the development of hazelnut orchards on sloping lands. Iranian J. of Rainwater Catchment System. 8 (25), 1-9. [In Persian]
13.Boers, Th. M., and Ben-Asher, J. (1980). A review of rainwater harvesting. Agricultural Water and Management. 5, 145-158.
14.Tavakoli, A., Oweis, T., Sepaskhah, A., Mahdavi Moghadam, M., & Farayedi, Y. (2021). Growing fruit trees with rainwater harvesting in arid environments: the case of almond in Northwest Iran. Water Harvesting Research. 4 (11), 55-68. [In Persian]
15.Boostan, Sh., Noura, M., Baniasadi, M., & Kahrazeh, M. (2020). The effect of rainwater catchment systems on runoff and sediment control (Case study: Darehmorid Watershed, Baft). Quarterly J. of Environmental Erosion Research. 39 (10), 42-55. [In Persian]
16.Huang, Z.B., Shan, L., Gao, L.E., Yang, X.M., & Ben-Hur, M. (2002). Artificial rainwater harvesting system and the using for agriculture on loess plateau of China. 12th ISCO Conference. 7p. Beijing: China.
17.Sadeghzadeh, M., Yarahmadi, J., Moghanlou, K., & Nikavand, D. (2017). The effect of rainwater catchment systems on increasing soil moisture and growth of Elaeagnus angustifolia in Oun Iban Ali, Tabriz. Iranian J. of Rainwater Catchment Systems. 5 (14), 19-28. [In Persian]
18.Moslehi, M. (2021). Investigation of vegetative characteristics of native forest species in different rainwater harvesting and their interaction on preservation and maintenance of soil moisture (Paired watershed of Dehgin of Hormozgan province). Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands. 71p. [In Persian]
19.Duveskog, D. (2003). Soil and water conservation with a focus on water harvesting and soil moisture retention. Ministry of Agriculture of Kenya: Farmesa. 20p. 
20.Moslehi, M., & Hassanzadeh Khankahdani H. (2020). Investigating the Effects of Different Methods of Precipitation Storage on Soil moisture and Growth Characteristics of Acacia Oerfota (Forssk) Schweinf Seedlings: A Case study of Paired Watershed of Dehgin, Hormozgan Province. J. of Desert Ecosystem Engineering.9 (26), 61-72. [In Persian]
21.Black, C. A. (1965). Methods of soil analysis: Part I physical and mineralogical properties. Madison. Wisconsin. American Soil Society of Agronomy Press. 1188p. 
22.Li, X., Shi, P., Sun, Y., Tang, J., & Yang, Z. (2006). Influence of various in situ rainwater harvesting methods on soil moisture and growth of Tamarix ramosissima in the semiarid loess region of China. Forest Ecology and Management. 233 (1), 143-148.
23.Rich, T. D. (2005). Effect of contour furrowing on soils, vegetation, and grassland breeding birds in North Dakota. USDA Forest Service: USA, Pp 496-503.
24.Oweis, T., & Hachum, A. (2006). Water harvesting and supplemental irrigation for improved water productivity of dry farming systems in West Asia and North Africa. Agricultural Water Management. 80 (1-3), 57-73.
25.Milkias, A., Tadesse, T., & Zeleke, H. (2018). Evaluating the effects of In-situ rainwater harvesting techniques on soil moisture conservation and grain yield of Maize in Fedis District, eastern Haraghe Ethiopia. Turkish J. of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology. 6 (9), 1129-1133.
26.Fadoul Mohammed, S., & Elamin Mohamed, A. (2016). Impact of water harvesting techniques on growth indigenous tree species in Jebel Awila locality, Sudan. Global J. of Science Frontier Research: Agriculture and Veterinary. 16 (3), 42-53.
27.Oweis, T., Hachum, A., & Kijne, J. (1999). Water harvesting and supplementary irrigation for improved water use efficiency in dry areas, SWIM Paper 7, Colombo, International Water Management Institute: Sri Lanka.
28.Gheituri, M., Heshmati, M., & Roghani, M. (2019). The effects of micro catchment runoff harvesting system
on soil moisture enhancement. Iranian J. of watershed management science.13 (47), 107-114. [In Persian]
29.Heshmati, M., Gheitutry, M., & Arabkhedri, M. (2020). Mitigating drought-induced mortality in the semiarid forest through runoff harvesting system, as a short-term adaptation measure. Desert. 25 (2), 239-248.
30.Molavi, A., Shahmohammadi-Kalalagh, S., & Abdolmanafi-Ahangari, M. (2022). Effect of mulch types on maintaining soil moisture in different landscape areas of Tabriz City. Environ. Water Eng. 8 (3), 581-593.
31.Liddcoat, C., Schapel, A., Davenport, D., & Dwyer, E. (2010). Soil carbon and climate change. Rural Solutions SA, Government of South Australia: Australia. 76p.
32.Broos, K., & Baldock, J. (2008). Building soil carbon for productivity and implications for carbon accounting, in 2008 South Australian GRDC Grains Research Update: Australia.
33.Hosseini Mand Roghani, M. (2012). Comparison of water harvesting methods in rhombic catchment systems. Watershed science and engineering of Iran. 6 (19), 7-18.
34.Wang, M., Shi, S., Lin, F., Hao, Z., Jiang, P., & Dai, G. (2012). Effects of soil water and nitrogen on growth and photosynthetic response of Manchurian Ash (Fraxinus mandshurica) seedling in Northeastern China. Plos One. 7 (2), 1-12.
35.Dasberg, S. (1971). Soil water movement to germinating seeds. J. of Experimental Botany. 22 (4), 999-1008.
Journal of Wood and Forest Science and Technology
Volume 30, Issue 3
October 2023
Pages 45-63

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics